Exploring Teachers' Perceptions of the Psychosocial Learning Environment in the Mathematics Classrooms

Authors

  • Dr. Nishat Zafar Associate Lecturer, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Mobeen Ul Islam Associate Professor, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Laraib Research Scholar, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/rl.v5i1.26163

Keywords:

Psychosocial Learning Environment, Mathematics Education, Teachers’ Perceptions, Classroom Climate, Gender Differences, Secondary Education

Abstract

The research investigated the perceptions of mathematics teachers in secondary schools on the use of psychosocial learning environment in classroom settings, and gender differences. A quantitative descriptive-comparative research design was used, and 120 teachers (60 boys, 60 girls) in the District Gujranwala public schools were interviewed in one of the adapted versions of the WIHIC (What Is Happening in This Class?) questionnaire. Findings revealed that the teachers tend to believe that their classrooms are supportive, collaborative, equitable, and well-structured with Equity, Student Cohesiveness and Task Orientation rated highest. Gender-wise, the analysis showed that female teachers tended to depict much the same situation than male teachers, with the difference existing in the majority of dimensions, such as Student Cohesiveness, Teacher Support, Involvement, Cooperation, and Equity, and the difference in Task Orientation did not have significance. The results show that it is crucial to encourage equitable, cooperative, and task-oriented learning settings to facilitate student engagement and effective teaching of mathematics. Teacher professional development, mentoring and classroom climate recommendations are addressed.

Author Biography

  • Dr. Mobeen Ul Islam, Associate Professor, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Boaler, J. (2015). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

Cohen, J., Mccabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record (1970), 111(1), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100108

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 77(1), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research desing: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (Vol. 54). United State of America: Sage Publications.

Day, C., & Leitch, R. (2001). Teachers’ and teacher educators’ lives: the role of emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00003-8

Donnell, L. A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers' acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, self-efficacy, and professional development. Teaching and teacher education, 51, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.003

Dorman, J. P. (2008). Using student perceptions to compare actual and preferred classroom environment in Queensland schools. Educational Studies, 34(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802034484

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fraser, B. J. (2011). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. Second International Handbook of Science Education, 1191-1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_79

Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M., & Adolphe, F. S. (2009). A cross-national study of secondary science classroom environments in Australia and Indonesia. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 551-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9133-1

Fraser, J. (1996). The translator investigated. The Translator, 2(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1996.10798964

Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2019). Addressing the role of working memory in mathematical word-problem solving when designing intervention for struggling learners. ZDM, 52(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01070-8

Gillies, R. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes.

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher (Washington, D.C.: 1972), 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09339057

Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026253

Koul, R. B. (2023). Classroom Learning Environments. Effective Teaching Around the World: Theoretical, Empirical, Methodological and Practical Insights, 317.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x08321501

Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Ascd.

McLeskey, J., Maheady, L., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M. T., & Lewis, T. J. (2022). High leverage practices for inclusive classrooms. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148609

Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83

Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 365-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17

Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Sandilos, L. (n.d.). Improving students' relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e501992017-001

Sandilos, L. E., Goble, P., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2018). Does professional development reduce the influence of teacher stress on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.009

Shindler, J., Jones, A., Williams, A. D., Taylor, C., & Cardenas, H. (2016). The school climate - Student achievement connection. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 1(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v1i1.1905

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840

Tobin, K., Ritchie, S. M., Oakley, J. L., Mergard, V., & Hudson, P. (2013). Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003

Wang, M., Hofkens, T., & Ye, F. (2020). Classroom quality and adolescent student engagement and performance in mathematics: A multi-method and multi-informant approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(10), 1987-2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01195-0

Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908x380772

Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E. (2002). Peer relationships and collaborative learning as contexts for academic enablers. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086161

Zins, J. E. (Ed.). (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

Zafar, N., Islam, M. U., & Laraib. (2026). Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions of the Psychosocial Learning Environment in the Mathematics Classrooms. Regional Lens, 5(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.55737/rl.v5i1.26163