Juvenile Detention and Rehabilitation: A Cross-Cultural Study of Public Policy and Architectural Design with Community-Based Approaches

Authors

  • Komal Shafique Lecturer, LCWU (Architecture Department), Graduate Student, Architecture Program, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Rifza Zahid Lecturer LCWU (Architecture Department), Graduate Student, City and Regional Planning, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Sarmad Salahuddin BIM Analyst, Researcher, Practicing Architect, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62997/rl.2025.41038

Keywords:

Juvenile Delinquency, Inmate Rehabilitation, Juvenile Justice System, Correctional Architecture, Environmental Psychology, Antisocial Behavior

Abstract

Due to the lack of a widely accepted definition, it is difficult to define juvenile criminal conduct. Still, it is generally defined as antisocial behavior or criminal activity committed by individuals under the age of 18. Criminal cases are governed by juvenile codes that prioritize rehabilitation over punishment and have the age of criminal liability set at 18 in the majority of legal systems. Juvenile correctional institutions are intended not as places of harsh confinement but as environments for safety, guidance, and personal reform. The purpose of this study is to investigate how environmental psychology and architectural design influence the creation of environments that aid in the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. It stresses the significance of therapeutic environments, non-punitive settings, and humane treatment. The study focuses on Punjab, Pakistan, & highlights a troubling infrastructure gap: Despite having the nation's highest juvenile crime rate, the region has only two outdated juvenile detention facilities and no dedicated juvenile courts. This demonstrates how urgently renovated, purpose-built spaces that place reform of retribution are required.

Author Biography

  • Komal Shafique, Lecturer, LCWU (Architecture Department), Graduate Student, Architecture Program, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Chaichian, M. A. (2024). Punishment or transformative rehabilitation? Architectural design and management of maximum-security prisons in the United States and Norway. In Cities, Heritage and Transformation (pp. 141–181). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59607-0_5

Chan, K., Scott, L., Samantha, A., Holquist, J., & Deja, G. (2018). Home - Child Trends. Child Trends. https://www.childtrends.org/

Child’s rights, D. (2021). Childeren in Prisons Punjab Report 2021. https://dastak.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2021-JJ-Report.pdf

Danawala, M. (2016). Central Jail And Reformation Centre. Rethinking The Future. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/architecture/commercial/central-jail-and-reformation-centre-mariya/

Edwards, L. (2008). Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative Newsletter. Access, 15(1), 1–4. https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/

Elrod, P., & Ryder, R. S. (2020). Juvenile Justice: A Social, Historical, and Legal Perspective: A Social, Historical, and Legal Perspective. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Fairweather, L., & McConville, S. (2013). Prison Architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080514840

Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research. (2019). Pakistan | World Prison Brief. In World Prison Brief. https://www.prisonstudies.org/country/pakistan

Karnam, M. (2010). Conditions of Detention in the Prisons of Karnataka 2007-08.

Karpinski, A. (2016). Breathing Through Bars: A Brief History on the Prison System in America. Soapboxie.

Kimble, J. (2015, August 14). The 50 Craziest Prisons and Jails in the World. Complex. https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/a/julian-kimble/the-50-craziest-prisons-and-jails-in-the-world

Maiello, L., Carter, S., Companies, C. G. L., & Min, B. (2016). Global Prison.

Micheletti, E. (2025). The Architecture of Incarceration - Changing Paradigms in Prison Architecture-libre. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/250447478/The-Architecture-of-Incarceration-Changing-Paradigms.

Moran, D., Jewkes, Y., & Turner, J. (2016). Prison design and carceral space. In Handbook on prisons (pp. 114-130). Routledge.

Petersen, E. L. (2013). Jacksonville Juvenile Detention [Community] Center: An Application of Adaptive Architecture [Savannah College of Art and Design]. https://scad.lunaimaging.com/luna/servlet/detail/SCAD~3~3~1106~6148:Jacksonville-Juvenile-Detention

Punjab, F. D. of. (2023). GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE FISCAL YEAR , 2023-24. 24, 15–20. https://finance.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/BER23-24.pdf

Rachmayani, A. N. (2015). Crime Prevention through Design.

Roush, D., & McMillen, M. (2000). Construction, operations, and staff training for juvenile confinement facilities. Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants (JAIBG) Best Practices, 1–28. Office of Justice Programs. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/construction-operations-and-staff-training-juvenile

Schaefer, D. R., Bouchard, M., Young, J. T. N., & Kreager, D. A. (2017). Friends in Locked Places: An Investigation of Prison Inmate Network Structure. Social Networks, 51, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.12.006

Skowyra, K. R., & Cocozza, J. J. (2006). The National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice Policy Research Associates, Inc. Delmar, NY. January.

Stott, R. (n.d.). A Radical New Approach to Prison Design. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/464371/a-radical-new-approach-to-prison-design

Tikkanen, A. (2022). Stanford Prison Experiment | History & Facts. In Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Stanford-Prison-Experiment

Victims, C., Children, M., Base, K., & Making, E. P. (n.d.). Juvenile_Justice_Policy_Gaps_Identificat.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shafique, K., Zahid, R., & Salahuddin, S. (2025). Juvenile Detention and Rehabilitation: A Cross-Cultural Study of Public Policy and Architectural Design with Community-Based Approaches. Regional Lens, 4(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.62997/rl.2025.41038