Co-operative Principle Reflection in ‘‘A Cup of Tea’s’’ Dialogues by Katherine Mansfield
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/rl.2025.41195Keywords:
Cooperative Principle, Four Maxims, Communication and Dialogues, ualitative Analysis, Ratio of Obeyed MaximAbstract
Interlocutors imply the Cooperative Principle’s Maxims to remain relevant, authentic, ordered and brief in their communication. Rationally, it is an increasing concern in pragmatics to decipher the way communicators use Paul Grice’s approach to Maxims of Conversation to achieve common ends. The purpose of this miniature research paper is to dig out the obeyed maxims in a literary piece of work’s dialogue between different fictional characters. The role Maxims plays in unfolding the variety of aspects of speakers and the way they use it to achieve their intentional purpose by elucidating their conversation through using Paul Grice’s approach. This qualitative research, under Paul Grice’s Cooperative Principle as a theoretical framework, analyses the dialogues between literary characters of the short story ‘A Cup of Tea by Katherine Mansfield. This also portrays the variety of themes emerges during their communication. The inference of this analysis shows that the social, economic and cultural backgrounds of the interlocutors play a significant role in their choice of maxims in communication. Rich people imply more manners and relation maxims in conversation to show their power, property and to elucidate their hypocritical communication. They use more quantity and quality maxims when communicating with those who belong to high strata of society, the same as the speaker. This study definitively answers the question that Maxims make communication clear, but also the social situation. This research implies that it enhances the awareness at the social and psychological level regarding communicators and the use of different maxims according to situation, making communication fruitful.
References
Abdi, R., Rizi, M. T., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1669–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001
Agung, S., & Kurnianingtyas, W. (2016). The Violation of Cooperative Principles on Students' Responses Toward Teacher Questions in Tefl Class. Kodifikasia, 10(1), 144540.
Ardhendu De. (2015). Critical Appreciation of Katherine Mansfield’s 'A Cup of Tea': Aware of the Hollowness of Existence. Published in AD’s English Literature.
Asmarani, R. (2018). The Psychological Character of Rosemary Fell in Katherine Mansfield’s Short Story Entitled" A Cup of Tea". Culturalistics: Journal of Cultural, Literary, and Linguistic Studies, 2(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.14710/culturalistics.v2i2.2552
Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(6), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90111-2
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction (pp. 56-310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. (2017). The Interface between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis. John Benjamin Publishers.
Fidler, M., & Lavbič, D. (2017). Improving information quality of Wikipedia articles with cooperative principle. Online Information Review, 41(6), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-01-2016-0003
Ghariri, A. (2020). A Stylistic Analysis of Katherine Mansfield’s Short Story ‘A Cup of Tea’. Global Scientific Journals, 8(3), 316-331.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Brill.
Jia, L. I. (2008). The Violation of Cooperative Principle and the Four Maxims in Psychological Consulting/LA VIOLATION DU PRINCIPE COOPERATIF ET LES QUATRE MAXIMES DANS LA CONSULTATION PSYCHOLOGIQUE. Canadian Social Science, 4(3), 87.
Khalil, H. H. (2007). Thought Presentation in Katherine Mansfield’s Short Stories. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 18(1), 226-257.
Kheirabadi, R., & Aghagolzadeh, F. (2012). Grice's cooperative maxims as linguistic criteria for news selectivity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 547. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.547-553
Lakoff, R. (1972). Language in context. Language, 907-927. https://doi.org/10.2307/411994
Leech, G. N. (1980). Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.i.5
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murray, J. M. (2016). Analysis of “A Cup of Tea” by Katherine Mansfield. Published in Graduate Way.
Pan, W. (2012). An analysis of vagueness in English news from Grice’s cooperative principles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.12.2530-2534
Richards, J. C. (1996). Teachers' maxims in language teaching. TESOL quarterly, 30(2), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588144
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Sedivy, J. C. (2007). Implicature during real time conversation: A view from language processing research. Philosophy compass, 2(3), 475-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00082.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



